ELYO

How to Improve Cycling Endurance: What the Research Says

Everyone tells you to ride in zone 2, follow 80/20, or ride more. What do studies actually say about trained cyclists, and what should you do when you only have a few hours a week?

The ELYO team

The sports coach that reads your workouts

5 min read

The short answer

There is no single proven recipe. A 2025 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport found that, in trained cyclists, polarized and other training distributions bring comparable gains, and riding more than you need brings no extra gain. Keep most of your rides easy and add intensity in small doses.

Key takeaways

  • In trained cyclists, polarized and non-polarized training bring comparable gains in VO2max and time trial performance.
  • The "80/20" split is seen in elite athletes who train 10 to 13 times a week. It describes how sessions are split, not a rule for amateurs.
  • Adding two interval sessions a week for 4 to 8 weeks improved performance by 2% to 4% in athletes who only did base endurance work.
  • Also consider heavy strength training, which improves pedaling economy, and fueling: 30 to 60 g of carbs per hour between 1 and 2.5 hours.

Advice on improving cycling endurance often contradicts itself: ride easy, ride more, ride in zone 2, add intervals. Most articles on the topic don't cite a single study.

Here is what meta-analyses and expert opinions say, followed by how to turn that into a week that fits your schedule.

The "80/20" split: an observation in elites, not a rule for everyone

In 2010, researcher Stephen Seiler described what national and international-level endurance athletes do. They train 10 to 13 times a week. About 80% of their sessions are low intensity, and about 20% include hard work.

This model is called polarized training. Comparison studies are more nuanced:

  • A 2024 meta-analysis (17 studies, 437 adults) finds a small advantage for polarized training on VO2peak, mostly in short interventions and in highly trained athletes. For time trials, there is no difference.
  • A 2025 meta-analysis of trained cyclists concludes that polarized and non-polarized training bring comparable gains in VO2max and time trial performance.
  • A 2019 meta-analysis, based on only 3 studies, suggested a time trial advantage for polarized training. The 2024 authors explain the gap by the number of studies included.

So don't look for the perfect percentage formula. Remember that a large share of your training should be easy, and that intensity gets added in small amounts.

Zone 2: a useful guide, not a switch

In 2025, 14 experts (scientists and professional cycling coaches) agreed on a definition: zone 2 is the intensity just below the first lactate or ventilatory threshold. You can hold it steady, vary it, or use it in intervals.

They don't expect large differences in adaptation between zone 2, the top of zone 1, and the bottom of zone 3. The body's responses form a continuum: one watt more or less doesn't change your ride into a different category.

This consensus is an expert opinion, not a controlled trial, and some researchers dispute that zone 2 is the best intensity for everyone. Coaches suggest riding at a pace where you can speak in full sentences, without worrying about a few beats per minute.

Free calculatorHeart rate zonesOpen the calculator →

Volume or intensity: what to do when you're short on time

The 2025 meta-analysis of trained cyclists offers a useful conclusion: beyond a necessary volume, adding more volume doesn't seem to improve performance. Riding more and more is not the only way forward.

On intensity, Seiler reports that in well-trained athletes who only did base endurance work, adding two interval sessions a week for 4 to 8 weeks improved performance by 2% to 4%.

The same text notes that in athletes who are already well trained, there is no proof that pushing intervals further brings long-term gains. Intensity is there to unlock progress, not to fill your week.

When time is short:

  • A shorter ride with a block of intensity is worth more than a short, easy-going ride.
  • A longer, easy ride still helps your endurance.
  • Three steady rides are worth more than five rides where two get skipped.

Strength training: useful for pedaling economy

A 2014 review of runners and cyclists recommends heavy strength training, alongside endurance work, to improve pedaling economy: producing the same power while using less energy.

Effects on power or speed at lactate threshold vary from study to study. So don't count on the gym to add watts at threshold. If you're new to it, have someone show you the movements. If pain persists, talk to a doctor.

Eating and drinking based on ride length

The German-speaking sports medicine position (König et al., 2020) gives these guidelines:

Effort durationCarbs per hour
1 to 2.5 hours30 to 60 g
More than 2.5 to 3 hoursup to 90 g, with a mix of carb types

The 2016 joint US-Canadian position statement says no carb intake is needed for efforts shorter than 45 minutes. Under that length, water is enough.

Don't aim for 90 g per hour over two hours: that figure is for very long efforts, and your stomach needs time to adapt. To check whether your plan worked, read our article on fueling for long rides.

What you can do on your next ride

  1. Pick your weekly schedule and stick to it for 4 weeks: for example, two easy rides and one with intervals.
  2. Ride truly easy. If you can't hold a conversation, slow down.
  3. Add a block of intensity only if your easy rides are going well, and keep it short.
  4. Schedule heavy strength sessions on the same days each week.
  5. Plan your fueling before any ride longer than an hour.
  6. Compare on the same route: same loop, same pace or power, and check whether your heart rate is lower than it was a month ago.

ELYO reads your watch's workout data, analyzes pace, heart rate, volume, and consistency, then adjusts your plan. It helps with the last step: spotting over several weeks whether your heart rate drops at the same effort.

Free calculatorFTP and power zonesOpen the calculator →

Frequently asked questions

Is zone 2 enough to improve?

It builds a good base, but it doesn't do everything. In athletes who only did base endurance work, adding two interval sessions a week for 4 to 8 weeks improved performance by 2% to 4%. Keep most of your rides in zone 2 and add a bit of intensity.

Should you ride longer or harder when you're short on time?

A 2025 meta-analysis of trained cyclists (Cove et al.) finds no gain from adding volume beyond what's necessary. When time is short, keep your rides consistent and put a block of intensity into one of them, rather than riding everything hard.

Should you do strength training to improve on the bike?

Studies on cyclists and runners recommend heavy strength training to improve pedaling economy. Its effect on power at threshold varies between studies, so do it to save energy, not to promise watts.

When should you start eating during a ride?

Under 45 minutes, the 2016 US-Canadian position statement says carbs aren't needed. Between 1 and 2.5 hours, the German-speaking sports medicine position (König et al., 2020) recommends 30 to 60 g of carbs per hour, and up to 90 g beyond 2.5 to 3 hours with a mix of carb types.

Sources

  1. Cove B., Chalmers S., Bennett H., et al. (2025). The effect of training distribution, duration, and volume on VO2max and performance in trained cyclists: a systematic review, multilevel meta-analysis, and multivariate meta-regression. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 28:423-434. DOI
  2. Silva Oliveira P., Boppre G., Fonseca H. (2024). Comparison of Polarized Versus Other Types of Endurance Training Intensity Distribution on Athletes' Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. DOI
  3. Seiler S. (2010). What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 5(3):276-291. DOI
  4. Sitko S., Artetxe X., Bonnevie-Svendsen M., et al. (2025). What Is "Zone 2 Training"?: Experts' Viewpoint on Definition, Training Methods, and Expected Adaptations. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 20(11). DOI
  5. Rønnestad B. R., Mujika I. (2014). Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 24(4):603-612. DOI
  6. König D., et al. (2020). Position Stand: Carbohydrates in Sports Nutrition. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin 71(7-8-9). Official text

Written with the help of AI.

What are your workouts telling you?

ELYO reads your watch data and gives you a first training review, for free.

No credit card needed

Discover ELYO

Get notified when ELYO launches

Leave your email: we'll write to you the day the app arrives on the App Store, and that's it.

Just one email at launch, then nothing without your consent.

Free to start · no credit card needed